Government, WVPA Sharing

W.Va. Senator Maynard challenges SB 261 plan to reduce magistrate judges in McDowell County

W.Va. Senator Maynard challenges SB 261 plan to reduce magistrate judges in McDowell County

By Erica Young

West Virginia Press Association Capitol Reporter

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Senator Mark Maynard, R-Wayne, sparked debate today at the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting when he proposed an amendment to SB 261, dealing with county magistrates.

Janie Moore, director of Magistrate Court Services, speaks to the W.Va. Senate Judiciary Committee on SB 261. WV Press Photo.

The bill is aimed to change the number of magistrates serving in some West Virginia counties and states that McDowell county would sit two magistrates instead of its current three, but Maynard’s amendment would eliminate this and allow the county to keep three magistrates.

Maynard said he felt it would help the already struggling county.

“Since I’ve been representing the 6thdistrict … so many things have gone against McDowell county and I just can’t sit here and let one more thing go against them.”

Earlier in the meeting, Maynard questioned Janie Moore, director of Magistrate Court Services, as to why McDowell County would be losing a magistrate, citing the poverty levels and opioid epidemic in the area as reasons for why this should not happen.

Moore said that the caseload had dropped between 2017 and 2018, but pointed out that it is technically the legislature who has the power to decide how many magistrates should serve in each county. She also said that the legislature is in charge of deciding when it is necessary to add or remove magistrates from a given county and the courts do not typically give their input on this unless asked.

Sarah Canterbury, counsel to the Judiciary Committee, said constitutionally, the legislature has the authority to decide the number of magistrates, but a bill was passed in 2000 giving the courts that authority.

Some senators openly disagreed with the amendment, namely Senator Ryan Weld, R-Brooke, who said he feels sympathy for those in McDowell County, but he does not feel as if another magistrate would drastically change the caseloads.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the committee voted on the amendment. After an 8-8 tie, Maynard’s amendment did not pass.


Comments are closed.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

And get our latest content in your inbox

Invalid email address