Do we want more government advice on nutrition?

An editorial from The Register-Herald

BECKLEY, W.Va. — The bad news last week was that West Virginia doesn’t just have the most obese city in the nation in Huntington, but we had Martinsburg waddling in at No. 3 and Charleston at No. 6 on the list, too.

The researchers were a grim sort who, we assume, have not an ounce of extra body fat between them. They warned Americans about our physiques. And we’d better listen up, or else:

“In order to combat the trend and encourage individuals to make healthier choices, community-based policy and environmental approaches can, and should, be used.”

What they mean is the government should get involved in ordering us what to eat and drink while sitting in our kitchens or at a restaurant table.

This would be the same government that told us we had to eat margarine instead of butter (marge contained, then, artery-clogging hydrogenated fats. Butter is better, we now know).

The government that told us we should eat, say, two eggs a year or health problems would descend on us like a doomsday cloud (new studies now show eggs are wholesome, healthy and a cheap source of protein).

We could — and we’re awfully tempted — go on and on here about how wrong the government has been about nutrition in the past few decades. In fact, many people believe the federal government’s oft-revised “food pyramid” with a little protein on the top and loads of carbs at the bottom may have contributed greatly to the nation’s obesity and diabetes problems.

But researchers taketh, and also giveth.

Another story last week had a study that confirmed decade-old research on “The Obesity Paradox,” and how heavier people might just outlive skinnier ones in the long run…

Click here for more.

Comments are closed.

West Virginia Press Newspaper Network " "

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

And get our latest content in your inbox

Invalid email address